Battle of Waterloo - Wikipedia
The Duke of Wellington: pioneer of the military crew cut Photo: with England appropriating a French classic during the Napoleonic Wars. The Duke of Wellington is not well thought of in his homeland. and whose relationship to the diminutive Napoleon remains ambivalent. Napoleon was one of the greatest military minds in the history of warfare. .. This fusion had one specific purpose in mind, a decisive battle. All of his After Blucher's defeat Napoleon turn all his attention on Wellington's Anglo-Dutch army .
Napoleon and Wellington: The Long Duel by Andrew Roberts
It is these two myths that the present work sets out to dispel, for the truth is far less straightforward and much more interesting. No, Wellington was not always the consummate, self-effacing gentleman.
Napoleon, on the other hand, expressed considerable appreciation for Wellington and his victories prior to Waterloo. And who won history? He uses his work to debunk serveral myths of Napoleon and Wellington and the finished product is a book that offers a nice comparison between both men how were they alike and how were they differenthow they viewed each other etc.
Roberts takes his time in pointing out that historians often misintepreted the words of both men and relied to heavily on sources that were honestly Andrew Roberts succeeds in telling the complex story of two great men who never actually met with class and clarity. Roberts takes his time in pointing out that historians often misintepreted the words of both men and relied to heavily on sources that were honestly coloured.Single, Not Alone :: Relationship Goals (Part 2)
Even though Roberts is known to be a great Napoleonfan, he does not let this come in the way in pointing out Napoleon's mistakes, character defects and when Napoleon was unfairly harsh on Wellington. Towards the end it offers a nice insight in the mind of Napoleon on St-Helena as he seems to slip further and further into depression and disillussion with his current faith and how he blamed Wellington for a large part of it.
Much of the book dealt with their personalities and their activities off the field of battle.
Only the last few dust ups leading toward Waterloo offered direct comparisons of their actions when facing each other. As to the strategies these two commanders utilized the author presented only brief descriptions. Assaye where a rapid manoeuvre and frontal attack smashed a force 8 times size of his Admitted mistakes freely and learned from them Never blamed his troops for failure.
Often hard on officers: Broke down on reading the Waterloo list Determined that Waterloo would be his last battle Military character Some commentators diagnose him as a psychopath, because he Seemed unable to feel remorse for the catastrophies he inflicted and the millions killed in the wars he waged Abandonned projects that became difficult, such as the Egyptian campaign Changed his mind often, and often gave confusing or contradictory orders Was unable to make close friends, and exploited those close to him e.
Did not learn from failure.
Usually blamed others Never forgotting an injury. Took disproportionate revenge Showed paranoic tendancies from childhood. Never acted impulsively but always with decision and great resolution Knew exactly where to be on the battlefield.
Major contribution to military tactics Hid infantry lines on the reverse slope of a hill, protecting them from artillery and the fire of attacking infantry Brought them to the firing line when attacking infantry as close as 25 metres Best example: Highly motivated troops French troops were feared across Europe, but Napoleon had little regard for their lives and he never spared them Demanded more and more effort and loyalty to him personally Sometimes cynical in his wastage of troops, expecting them to lay down their lives in loyalty for him Worst example: Knowing fhat he wanted to conserve them gave his troops greater trust in him.
Troops always inspired by his presence Relationship with troops Looked on his troops as an expensible item in is conquests, and he wasted them in amanner that often shocked his own marshals.
Though he has a long-term goal of conquest, he does not seem to have had any long term vision, except to subdue Europe under France, and subdue France under his own rule. Main strategic policy Low risk strategy, featuring Conserving forces Avoiding battle unless necessary and victory certain. The navy the darling of the British after Trafalgar Strategy driven by Need for glory, which he freely admitted, and which had to fed on victory after victory Need for funds from conquered states, since France was largely bankrupt Need for public approbation.
- Battle of Waterloo
- Napoleon and Wellington: The Long Duel
- The upstart and the toff
Victories and conquests covered corruption, incompetence and maladministration at home National Support Government often left Wellington short of resources and troops. However, most of these troops deployed to forestall royalist uprisings, which certainly would have followed had the troops been withdrawn to fight the Allies Publicity Campaign not widely publicised at first and British people indifferent.