Creating multiple tables and table relationships
It is a one to many from the "Children" table; one child to many staff, one child to one or more "ResponsibleAdults" (who could be any familial. and an account table with a foreign key relationship between the two which is 1 inserted or updated to amek sure the person currently has no more than one. Having all our data in one table can make for very difficult data management. We can split data in specialized tables that are related to one another.
database - One to two () relation between two tables - Stack Overflow
A one-to-one relationship between two entities exists when a particular entity instance exists in one table, and it can have only one associated entity instance in another table. A user can have only one address, and an address belongs to only one user.
In the database world, this sort of relationship is implemented like this: Let's go ahead and add some data to our table. Referential Integrity We're going to take a slight detour here to discuss a topic that's extremely important when dealing with table relationships: This is a concept used when discussing relational data which states that table relationships must always be consistent.
Different RDBMSes might enforce referential integrity rules differently, but the concept is the same.
MySQL Tutorial - MySQL By Examples for Beginners
The constraints we've defined for our addresses table enforce the one to one relationship we want between it and our users table, whereby a user can only have one address and an address must have one, and only one, user. This is an example of referential integrity.
Let's demonstrate how this works. What happens if we try to add another address for a user who already has one? How about if we try to add an address for a user who doesn't exist? Here we get a different error. If you're wondering why we can add a user without an address but can't add an address without a user, this is down to the modality of the relationship between the two entities.
Don't worry about exactly what this means for now, just think of it as another aspect of entity relationships. Adding this clause, and setting it to CASCADE basically means that if the row being referenced is deleted, the row referencing it is also deleted. Determining what to do in situations where you delete a row that is referenced by another row is an important design decision, and is part of the concept of maintaining referential integrity.
One-to-Many Okay, time to get back to our different table relationship types with a look at one-to-many. A one-to-many relationship exists between two entities if an entity instance in one of the tables can be associated with multiple records entity instances in the other table. The opposite relationship does not exist; that is, each entity instance in the second table can only be associated with one entity instance in the first table.
A book has many reviews. A review belongs to only one book. Let's set up the necessary data. There's a key difference worth pointing out in the statement for our reviews table however: In other words a book can have many reviews. Now we have created our books and reviews tables, let's add some data to them. If it is then we may choose to refresh the object with the new data values this is a concurrency issue.
A similar process would have been followed to read in the employees involved in a given task. To save the relationship, still from the point of view of the Employee object, the steps would be: Add Update statements for any task objects that have changed. Add Insert statements for the Task table for any new tasks that you have created. Add Insert statements for the EmployeeTask table for the new tasks.
Add Delete statements for the Task table any tasks that have been deleted. This may not be necessary if the individual object deletions have already occurred.
Add Delete statements for the EmployeeTask table for any tasks that have been deleted, a step that may not be needed if the individual deletions have already occurred. Add Delete statements for the EmployeeTask table for any tasks that are no longer assigned to the employee. Many-to-many relationships are interesting because of the addition of the associative table. Two business classes are being mapped to three data tables to support this relationship, so there is extra work to do as a result.
When mapping this to a relational database you need to add an addition column to track this information. The database schema, also depicted in Figure 1includes the column OrderItem.
ItemSequence to persist this information. Although this mapping seems straightforward on the surface, there are several issues that you need take into consideration. These issues become apparent when you consider basic persistence functionality for the aggregate: Read the data in the proper sequence.
The scaffolding attribute that implements this relationship must be a collection that enables sequential ordering of references and it must be able to grow as new OrderItems are added to the Order. In Figure 2 you see that a Vector is used, a Java collection class that meets these requirements. As you read the order and order items into memory the Vector must be filled in the proper sequence.
If the values of the OrderItem. ItemSequence column start from 1 and increase by 1 then you can simply use the value of the column as the position to insert order items into the collection. You have an order with five order items in memory and they have been saved into the database.
One-to-One, One-to-Many Table Relationships in SQL Server
You now insert a new order item in between the second and third order items, giving you a total of six order items. With the current data schema of Figure 1 you have to renumber the sequence numbers for every order item that appears after the new order item and then write out all them even though nothing has changed other than the sequence number in the other order items.
Because the sequence number is part of the primary key of the OrderItem table this could be problematic if other tables, not shown in Figure 1refer to rows in OrderItem via foreign keys that include ItemSequence. When do you update sequence numbers after rearranging the order items?
Whenever you rearrange order items on an order, perhaps you moved the fourth order item to be the second one on the order, you need to update the sequence numbers within the database.
Do you update sequence numbers after deleting an order item? If you delete the fifth of six order items do you want to update the sequence number for what is now the fifth item or do you want to leave it as it. The sequence numbers still work — the values are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 — but you can no longer use them as the position indicators within your collection without leaving a hole in the fifth position.
Consider sequence number gaps greater than one. Instead of assigning sequence numbers along the lines of 1, 2, 3, … instead assign numbers such as 10, 20, 30 and so on.
ItemSequence column every time you rearrange order items because you can assign a sequence number of 15 when you move something between 10 and You will need to change the values every so often, for example after several rearrangements you may find yourself in the position of trying to insert something between 17 and Larger gaps help to avoid this e. For example the manages relationship in Figure 16 is recursive, representing the concept that an employee may manage several other employees.
The aggregate relationship that the Team class has with itself is recursive — a team may be a part of one or more other teams. Figure 16 depicts a class model that includes two recursive relationships and the resulting data model that it would be mapped to. For the sake of simplicity the class model includes only the classes and their relationships and the data model includes only the keys.
The many-to-many recursive aggregation is mapped to the Subteams associative table in the same way that you would map a normal many-to-many relationship — the only difference is that both columns are foreign keys into the same table.
Mapping Class-Scope Properties Sometimes a class will implement a property that is applicable to all of its instances and not just single instances.
Because there is one value for this attribute for the class, not one value per object, we need to map it in a different manner.